Math Jazz — Mathias Bynens’s shizzle, y’all



Note: This site might seem inactive… That’s because it is. Don’t worry though, I’m still coding webpages and stuff! If you’re interested, I suggest you get a translator and head over to Qiwi; or you could just check the latest site we’ve been working on: Apotheek Goethals – Debrabandere. Enjoy!

New Google “Feature”

I could swear it wasn’t like this five minutes ago. Check it out, Google search result pages no longer link directly to the resulting pages. In fact, those links now look like http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=$1&q=$2&e=747, in which $i contains the position on the search results page, and $2 is the link’s URI. Why oh why is that?

Update: It has vanished! Google went back to what it was before. I managed to recover the second page of search results for shizzle my nizzle y’all from my cache. So check that out, too, and note how $1 goes from 11 to 20.

Filed under HTTP, Google · January 22nd, 2005

Comments (9)

Listed below are the responses for this entry.

  1. Basil Crow:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    They’ve done this before a few times too, particularly when they were beta testing. As far as I know, it only affects some people using Google at some times, never permanently.

    Comment posted on January 22nd, 2005 @ 4:07 pm
  2. Mathias:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    Oh… So it’s nothing new? Damn. I had never seen it before.

    But really, what could this thing ever be good for? If every link would be like that, we wouldn’t be able to tell which pages we already visited from those which we still have to… erm… check out.

    Comment posted on January 22nd, 2005 @ 4:21 pm
  3. Bart Noppen:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    By redirecting users they can register what links get clicked and which not.

    Comment posted on January 22nd, 2005 @ 6:03 pm
  4. matthew:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    I have seen this type of behaviour at google before and when I did I thought ‘wtf?’ too.

    Comment posted on January 23rd, 2005 @ 6:11 am
  5. Zanneloon:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    I saw it too! Already 4 times…

    Comment posted on January 30th, 2005 @ 8:04 pm
  6. Mathias:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    For a second, I thought I discovered something new… Not!

    What’s interesting though is that Google’s contemplating on tracking what links get clicked. I mean, c’mon, don’t they know enough already?

    For all searches they record the cookie ID, your Internet IP address, the time and date, your search terms, and your browser configuration. Increasingly, Google is customizing results based on your IP number. This is referred to in the industry as IP delivery based on geolocation.

    Comment posted on January 30th, 2005 @ 8:59 pm
  7. Peter:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    The IP address, cookie, querystring (search terms), … that’s standard stuff that every web server logs. They’re just trying to be not evil by explicitly saying it.

    The reason they use the redirect technique you noticed is to see if their algorithms deliver good results. If for most of the searches, Google can come up with relevant results for the search terms, the $1 numbers will be low. If in a lot of cases users don’t find what they are looking for in the first 10-20 results (so the $1 numbers are on average higher), Google will conclude they are doing something wrong and might adapt the algorithm.

    They probably do it on a subset of their servers every now and then, and keep track of the average value and std deviation of the $1.

    IP delivery based on geolocation? That term was clearly invented by an engineer, not a marketeer :)

    Comment posted on February 1st, 2005 @ 8:06 pm
  8. Sam:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    I just noticed this as well. From what I can tell they wish to find out how many pages deep someone will go to find a link … if you searched 5 pages worth of results to find keywords ‘dynamic dns’ they would know that you really didn’t find what you are looking for on page 1 or 2. I didn’t realize they were still doing this — and 2 machines on my network, 1 does it, 1 doesn’t… so it must be if you have a cookie or something. I just searched out this post looking for anyone else experiencing this effect as well, just noticed my URLs doing that 10 minutes ago.

    Sam — the Dynamic DNS man.

    Comment posted on April 14th, 2005 @ 1:18 am
  9. Vincent:
    This commenter’s Gravatar

    The e=NUM and start=NUM are showing up only if you have a cookie from Google.

    I have just tested this. Started my Firefox searched for “blue widgets” and the results were normal.

    Then I logged into my AdSense account at Google, then searched again and here they come, the numbers and redirect trackings are there.

    I think it has something to do with their registration agreements.
    See: http://www.google.com/privacy.html.

    If you have an account, we may share the information submitted under your account among all of our services in order to provide you with a seamless experience and to improve the quality of our services. We will not disclose your account information to other people or non-affiliated companies, except in the limited circumstances described in this Policy or with your consent.

    IMHO this explains the strange params in the SERP’s URLs.

    Comment posted on June 13th, 2005 @ 8:32 am